←back to thread

1106 points sama | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.222s | source
Show context
etendue ◴[] No.12508615[source]
How would one go about meaningfully contributing to solving problems in genetics without having done the work leading to a MD or PhD (or both)?
replies(12): >>12508778 #>>12508797 #>>12508867 #>>12508944 #>>12508966 #>>12509126 #>>12509458 #>>12509642 #>>12510494 #>>12511112 #>>12511652 #>>12511653 #
1. TeMPOraL ◴[] No.12508966[source]
You probably couldn't. But if you refer to two things Musk said - a) genetics is important, and b) PhD is not the best way to be useful - I think he didn't mean it to be taken together. He spent some time talking about how being useful means "area under the curve" - do a big thing for small number of people, or do a small thing for a large number of people. Most people can aim for either of the two, and in both cases PhD is probably not the most efficient use of your time.