←back to thread

1106 points sama | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
etendue ◴[] No.12508615[source]
How would one go about meaningfully contributing to solving problems in genetics without having done the work leading to a MD or PhD (or both)?
replies(12): >>12508778 #>>12508797 #>>12508867 #>>12508944 #>>12508966 #>>12509126 #>>12509458 #>>12509642 #>>12510494 #>>12511112 #>>12511652 #>>12511653 #
1. bbctol ◴[] No.12508867[source]
This is why Theranos was such an effective scam: the current culture of "innovation" is so heavily based in software, an unconstrained space where a creative wunderkind can make great advances, it thinks all problems can be solved through sheer thinking outside the box, "disruption," and dreaming big. Those are all good things to try, but I don't think it's a coincidence Silicon Valley-based big-dreaming startups aren't doing nearly as well as big, boring research labs with heavy understanding of the science and measured goals.