←back to thread

Fixing JSON

(www.tbray.org)
139 points robin_reala | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.205s | source
Show context
cocktailpeanuts ◴[] No.12328311[source]
I don't know who the OP is but I'll assume he's an authority in JSON since he talks about how he wrote some RFCs and stuff.

Anyway this is why I think there should be a better way to move tech standards forward than leaving it up to some small number of people who are way too ahead of the curve that they think everyone else has the same problem they do.

In my opinion there is nothing wrong with commas. I am sure the OP had his own issues while working too much with JSON, but for the 90% of the population it's not a problem and even a better way to represent data.

As an example, [116, 943, 234, 38793] is 100% clear and intuitive. Anyone who has seen any array representation will get what this means. But change it to [116 943 234 38793]? There are so many ways you can interpret this. I guess the only people who would think this is better than the 100% intuitive [116, 943, 234, 38793] option are JSON nerds who think too much about this (and when I say JSON nerds I don't mean JSON "users", but people who try to come up with the standard)

As someone who really hates what's going on with javascript (with all the new syntax that needlessly sacrifices simplicity and intuitive nature for the sake of making things shorter), I can't really think nicely about these opinions.

I think these standards that are used by a huge population should move forward in a more democratic way. Or at least let more "normal" people make the decision.

replies(1): >>12328327 #
1. MrZongle2 ◴[] No.12328327[source]
The author, Tim Bray, is one of the co-authors of the XML specification; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Bray