←back to thread

142 points helloworld | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.26s | source
Show context
seibelj ◴[] No.12306806[source]
Can anyone succinctly explain the benefits of having a market for private health insurance companies, rather than a single provider of health insurance (government, aka "public option")? Can a capitalist case be made for their existence? Does the lack of a large private insurance market in countries with government-provided health insurance cause lots of inefficiencies and waste?
replies(35): >>12306825 #>>12306846 #>>12306849 #>>12306865 #>>12306883 #>>12306896 #>>12306906 #>>12306909 #>>12306920 #>>12306921 #>>12306948 #>>12306954 #>>12306958 #>>12306977 #>>12306983 #>>12307038 #>>12307105 #>>12307152 #>>12307153 #>>12307306 #>>12307335 #>>12307342 #>>12307397 #>>12307504 #>>12307572 #>>12307975 #>>12308036 #>>12308110 #>>12308127 #>>12308342 #>>12308357 #>>12308931 #>>12309015 #>>12309142 #>>12309820 #
VonGuard ◴[] No.12306849[source]
There is no benefit. The benefit is for the legislatures who passed the law. There was no way that we'd get single payer here in the US because our Congress is very much in the pocket of the health care industry. As such, the markets were a compromise measure enacted by congress to make it easier for people to choose health care. Before Obamacare, it was sort of a black box where only HR people could figure out pricing structures and health care providers didn't really compete in any way with each other.

Obamacare did do some good things that needed to be done, but essentially, everything about it was a bandaid intended to kick this shitty system down the road to the next person who had to deal with it. But hey, at least health care companies can't just turn you down because you have Diabetes or are too fat anymore.

replies(3): >>12306932 #>>12306935 #>>12310096 #
Frondo ◴[] No.12306935[source]
Obamacare has had one significant, lasting effect: culturally, the idea is now that everyone should have access to health care. That's the default. Bringing in a public option will be an easy, natural next step, if not for Clinton, then for whoever succeeds her.
replies(3): >>12307225 #>>12307336 #>>12313221 #
VonGuard ◴[] No.12307225[source]
If Clinton brings us single payer, I will worship at her altar forever. She used to promise this stuff in the 90's, but basically gave it all up when she actually went into politics and gained public office, later saying single payer will not work.

If she does get us single payer, she's the greatest trojan horse ever in American politics.

replies(1): >>12307299 #
nappy-doo ◴[] No.12307299[source]
> If she does get us single payer, she's the greatest trojan horse ever in American politics.

Arguably, that'd be Trump instead of Clinton.

replies(1): >>12307699 #
VonGuard ◴[] No.12307699[source]
I think Trump is more of an infected pot of filth catapulted over the walls... Not sure he's hiding much.
replies(1): >>12308086 #
1. jessaustin ◴[] No.12308086[source]
I'm torn. Sometimes I think Trump would be the most average President ever, and sometimes I think we have no idea at all what he would do. I'm quite sure it's unlikely he'll do anything that he's campaigned on. Wall-building is work.