←back to thread

212 points DamienSF | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
vannevar ◴[] No.12174358[source]
I think the most interesting (and perhaps hopeful) aspect here is that people now have an expectation of fairness in the selection of party candidates. That's a relatively new phenomenon. In the past, I think people widely assumed that the party was biased towards individual candidates. Even now, that's clearly the case when the sitting President is a candidate. I personally think that expecting an unbiased party structure is unrealistic, given the very nature of the organization. The party doesn't have a product, other than its opinion. The idea that an organization of partisans only arrives at that collective opinion through primaries and caucuses seems quite naive to me.
replies(7): >>12174618 #>>12174770 #>>12174773 #>>12175036 #>>12175412 #>>12175417 #>>12175973 #
Ericson2314 ◴[] No.12175412[source]
I'm sympathetic, but without a parliamentary system the US cannot have an effective market of political parties. And without such a market, primaries need to be democratic.
replies(1): >>12176156 #
1. xenophonf ◴[] No.12176156[source]
I'm not sure a parliamentary system is necessary. Instead, I think we need to make three reforms:

- non-partisan redistricting

- instant runoff voting

- automatic voter registration

replies(1): >>12179084 #
2. Ericson2314 ◴[] No.12179084[source]
Is instant runoff like ranked choice?