←back to thread

212 points DamienSF | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.318s | source
Show context
vannevar ◴[] No.12174358[source]
I think the most interesting (and perhaps hopeful) aspect here is that people now have an expectation of fairness in the selection of party candidates. That's a relatively new phenomenon. In the past, I think people widely assumed that the party was biased towards individual candidates. Even now, that's clearly the case when the sitting President is a candidate. I personally think that expecting an unbiased party structure is unrealistic, given the very nature of the organization. The party doesn't have a product, other than its opinion. The idea that an organization of partisans only arrives at that collective opinion through primaries and caucuses seems quite naive to me.
replies(7): >>12174618 #>>12174770 #>>12174773 #>>12175036 #>>12175412 #>>12175417 #>>12175973 #
1. EdHominem ◴[] No.12174618[source]
It's not the issue that there are inputs other than the wishes of the delegates, it's that those other inputs almost totally override the delegates and make the whole thing a sham.

As it is, the only purpose the delegates have is to fool people into believing in the result.