←back to thread

1401 points alankay | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.443s | source

This request originated via recent discussions on HN, and the forming of HARC! at YC Research. I'll be around for most of the day today (though the early evening).
1. olantonan ◴[] No.11944264[source]
No language today is able to improve itself like Smalltalk was able to. That's pretty sad, wouldn't you say?
replies(1): >>11945929 #
2. alankay1 ◴[] No.11945929[source]
Let's give Dan Ingalls the majority of the credit here. I will admit to "seeing" what was possible, but Dan was able to make really great compromises between what Should Be vs what would allow us to make great progress in the early 70s on relatively small machines (give Chuck Thacker the majority of the credit here for similar "art of the possible" with the Parc HW).

I liked the MOP book because they carried the model more deeply into the actual definitions -- I very much liked their metaphor that you want to supply a "region of design and implementation space" rather than a single point.