←back to thread

Ubuntu on Windows

(blog.dustinkirkland.com)
2049 points bpierre | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
partycoder ◴[] No.11395663[source]
While I encourage people to embrace open source tools and libraries as much as possible, I also would like to issue a word of caution on feeling too comfortable targeting a proprietary environment such as Windows.

Some people have compared Mac OS X and Windows because of their proprietary nature, but one key difference is that you don't run Mac OS X as a server operating system or on the cloud. While many people develop on Mac OS X, they might still build and deploy to a Linux server.

For Windows to support the GNU/Linux userland is to finally empower Windows as a competitive platform for the cloud. Windows has suddenly became a viable deployment target for a wide spectrum of software that prior to this could not target Windows.

I am not looking forward for a lower market share of Linux (or BSD, Solaris derivatives, to be fair) on servers or on the cloud.

replies(2): >>11395686 #>>11395763 #
nekkoru ◴[] No.11395763[source]
(...)one key difference is that you don't run Mac OS X as a server operating system or on the cloud.

http://www.apple.com/osx/server/

It's actually a pretty decent server environment.

replies(2): >>11395771 #>>11395873 #
partycoder ◴[] No.11395771[source]
That's a valid point, but you cannot elastically provision 100 OS X servers machines on demand in the cloud.
replies(1): >>11395778 #
1. nekkoru ◴[] No.11395778{3}[source]
I don't think anyone has tried it, but is there a reason why it couldn't be done?