←back to thread

Ubuntu on Windows

(blog.dustinkirkland.com)
2049 points bpierre | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
AimHere ◴[] No.11392908[source]
It's time that people stopped using the term 'Windows' for this operating system. The Free Software Foundation created the bulk of the userspace, under terms that allow anyone to share, modify and fork the programs, and then Microsoft came along with the one last missing piece of the puzzle - the kernel, and completed the full operating system, which, to be frank, users find completely unusable and worthless without the free software provided by GNU.

The kernel is an important part of the system, sure, but only one among many important parts. We therefore think that, to give full credit to the authors, the whole system should be termed GNU/Windows.

replies(12): >>11392913 #>>11393045 #>>11393084 #>>11393200 #>>11393385 #>>11393429 #>>11393564 #>>11393576 #>>11393782 #>>11393824 #>>11393880 #>>11394049 #
iamcurious ◴[] No.11393200[source]
You jest, but I agree. I might accept a GNU/Windows machine as a working computer, but I would be a lot more weary of accepting just a Windows machine.
replies(1): >>11393240 #
stingraycharles ◴[] No.11393240[source]
Would this be possible? How far could anyone (outside of Microsoft) strip down Windows to leave behind just a kernel with a functioning GNU environment (let's say, a shell and file access) ?
replies(4): >>11393349 #>>11393351 #>>11395032 #>>11395082 #
1. mappu ◴[] No.11395082[source]
There's at least one free (gratis) version of Windows available (Hyper-V Server) that's missing the Explorer shell and some other parts.

I have successfully installed KDE on this (via Cygwin plus a mesa/llvmpipe build of opengl32.dll). It seemed to work OK.