←back to thread

Ubuntu on Windows

(blog.dustinkirkland.com)
2049 points bpierre | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.263s | source
Show context
bcantrill ◴[] No.11392265[source]
This is great to see, as it's very similar to the approach that we took with LX-branded zones on SmartOS[1][2]. I commented at some length on the other thread on this on HN[3], but I have a bunch of questions about apps that we know to be thorny: Go, strace, tcpdump, systemd, etc. As we learned, this approach is entirely possible -- but there are many, many details to be nailed before you get to the point that you can run production applications on it. So while the journey across the uncanny valley of Linux is long and arduous, we know from our experience that it can be done. Very much hoping that Microsoft gets to the other side -- and that they open source it all so we can all learn from one another!

[1] http://www.slideshare.net/bcantrill/illumos-lx

[2] http://us-east.manta.joyent.com/patrick.mooney/public/talks/...

[3] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11392119

replies(5): >>11392299 #>>11392418 #>>11393777 #>>11395242 #>>11395345 #
braderhart ◴[] No.11393777[source]
Bryan, huge fan here! I agree and believe this is just a primer to making that happen. I'd personally like to see containers become the default for application deployment and sandboxing on all operating systems:

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/why-you-should-help-me-create...

Any chance you're planning for a "desktop" version of SmartOS?

replies(1): >>11394772 #
1. bcantrill ◴[] No.11394772[source]
We're not -- but that's not to say we wouldn't encourage it! Bluntly, for us it's a driver issue: things like WiFi NICs are infamously varied and buggy, and we have our hands full (just) supporting modern server hardware. But don't let that stop you!