←back to thread

Ubuntu on Windows

(blog.dustinkirkland.com)
2049 points bpierre | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source | bottom
Show context
plank ◴[] No.11391528[source]
Confused: can we now START or STOP bashing windows?
replies(3): >>11391850 #>>11391992 #>>11392706 #
1. deagle50 ◴[] No.11391850[source]
After they fix highdpi scaling
replies(2): >>11392601 #>>11394374 #
2. insulanian ◴[] No.11392601[source]
Oh yes... That's one of the reasons I switched to OSX.
replies(1): >>11393522 #
3. deagle50 ◴[] No.11393522[source]
no kidding, I have a 4K monitor that looks awesome when hooked up my macbook and terrible when hooked up to my Windows desktop
replies(1): >>11394319 #
4. randyrand ◴[] No.11394319{3}[source]
Win10 on my dual 4ks looks great. What issues do you have?
replies(1): >>11394809 #
5. davesque ◴[] No.11394374[source]
They're working on it. The rub now is that they can't handle (last I checked) using two monitors with significantly different DPIs. At least, that's how it was with my retina macbook and using an external monitor that was low DPI.
6. deagle50 ◴[] No.11394809{4}[source]
I'm not really sure if you're serious about this question...

Well the task manager for example, the header is rendered per pixel, the rest of the window is a blurry mess. File Explorer window scales with DPI setting but for some reason the fonts still render at 4k pixel size even at 175% scaling making it very hard to read. Chrome looks like its rendering at much lower resolution then blowing back up. Resizing a busy window chugs my GTX 980 yet the Haswell integrated GPU on my MBP 13" handles 5120x2800 pretty well on OSX.

Why can't they just supersample the user-selected resolution then shrink back down to 4k like OSX? Everyone already has retina assets for their app.