←back to thread

Ubuntu on Windows

(blog.dustinkirkland.com)
2049 points bpierre | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.221s | source
Show context
zymhan ◴[] No.11390932[source]
"Linux geeks can think of it sort of the inverse of "wine" -- Ubuntu binaries running natively in Windows. Microsoft calls it their "Windows Subsystem for Linux"."

I find it amazing that you can have such a functional Ubuntu environment by translating system calls. Microsoft does have the advantage of Linux being open-source I suppose, while the Wine project had to reverse engineer DLLs. Or have you supply them on your own.

replies(9): >>11391001 #>>11391011 #>>11391074 #>>11391084 #>>11391105 #>>11391166 #>>11391290 #>>11391798 #>>11391866 #
anonymfus ◴[] No.11391084[source]
>Microsoft does have the advantage of Linux being open-source

More correctly would be to say that Microsoft has advantage of user space libraries used in GNU/Linux distributions being open-source. Linux kernel itself being GPL2 is probably a problem for Microsoft's developers because of possibility to be accidentally exposed to it while researching documentation.

replies(1): >>11391115 #
digi_owl ◴[] No.11391115[source]
Thats why you do it clean room style.

One team to document, one team to implement based on that document.

replies(1): >>11391497 #
vram22 ◴[] No.11391497[source]
What does "clean room" style mean, exactly? I've heard the term, but only in connection with semiconductor factories, I think. You're talking about software here.
replies(3): >>11391647 #>>11391686 #>>11391715 #
1. alcari ◴[] No.11391686[source]
The usual term is "Chinese Wall" [1].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_wall