←back to thread

Ubuntu on Windows

(blog.dustinkirkland.com)
2049 points bpierre | 4 comments | 30 Mar 16 16:35 UTC | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
xaduha ◴[30 Mar 16 17:10 UTC] No.11390950[source]▶
> Windows 10 users

> Can open the Windows Start menu

> And type "bash" [enter]

> Which opens a cmd.exe console

Right... Bash is a shell, but your interaction with it is controlled by a terminal program. Unless there are some real changes to cmd.exe t̶h̶e̶n̶ ̶i̶t̶'̶s̶ ̶n̶o̶t̶ ̶t̶h̶a̶t̶ ̶i̶m̶p̶r̶e̶s̶s̶i̶v̶e̶ . You can compile a native bash and other utils now yourself, it's not that hard.

EDIT: It's more like a Linuxulator from BSD, which is certainly cool.

replies(5): >>11390968 #>>11390991 #>>11391035 #>>11391091 #>>11391196 #
AlexeyBrin ◴[30 Mar 16 17:15 UTC] No.11390991[source]▶
You seem to completely miss the point of what they did. It is not a simple Bash recompilation for Windows. It is a way to run Linux (Ubuntu) binaries on Windows.
replies(3): >>11391133 #>>11391155 #>>11391172 #
xaduha ◴[30 Mar 16 17:29 UTC] No.11391133[source]▶
My point is that you need a terminal program (like putty or iTerm2 on OS X for example) to get all the benefits.
replies(1): >>11391178 #
tlrobinson ◴[30 Mar 16 17:32 UTC] No.11391178[source]▶
He says it mostly works in cmd.exe, and they're working on getting things like screen/tmux working too.

If a fully-compatible terminal emulator doesn't exist yet (I have no idea) I bet there will be one within a year.

replies(1): >>11391583 #
1. quotemstr ◴[30 Mar 16 18:10 UTC] No.11391583{3}[source]▶
conhost (the black box that typically runs cmd.exe) is a terribly shitty terminal emulator. My biggest gripe with Windows has been the lack of a decent pseudoconsome system that would allow an ecosystem of terminal emulators to developer, as one has for POSIX-ish systems.
replies(2): >>11393788 #>>11415843 #
2. ZenoArrow ◴[30 Mar 16 23:22 UTC] No.11393788[source]▶
What about ConEmu? Works well for me, I especially like the Quake-style dropdown terminal option...

https://github.com/Maximus5/ConEmu

replies(1): >>11394082 #
3. quotemstr ◴[31 Mar 16 00:16 UTC] No.11394082[source]▶
ConEmu looks nice; it came out after I switched from Windows to Linux, so I've never tried it. I like the idea of hooking the console API functions; before I stopped using Windows, I was working independently on a similar API-hooking system that talked to the Cygwin pty layer instead of to a custom terminal.

With a real pty, you'd be able to use any Windows console program with mintty, sshd, Emacs term-mode, or whatever else you wanted, transparently. I regret not having a chance to finish that work.

4. JdeBP ◴[03 Apr 16 12:09 UTC] No.11415843[source]▶
> My biggest gripe with Windows has been the lack of a decent pseudoconsome system that would allow an ecosystem of terminal emulators to developer, as one has for POSIX-ish systems.

This has been up since the turn of the century:

* http://homepage.ntlworld.com./jonathan.deboynepollard/FGA/ca...

The demonstrators in the Microsoft video do warn that they will be avoiding some of the holes of the system in their demonstration. One is very briefly visible at 08'13", before the demonstrator rapidly clears the screen (again), when they run apt-get to install git:

  E: Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty (2: No such file or directory)
The new Windows NT Linux subsystem apparently doesn't have pseudo-terminals.

The old Windows NT POSIX subsystem (the Interix-derived SFU/SFUA one) has pseudo-terminals with both BSD and System 5 access semantics, in comparison.

* https://technet.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/bb497016.aspx

* https://technet.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/bb463219.aspx

Moreover, a Windows console window that is the controlling TTY of a POSIX program in that subsystem has the POSIX cooked input mode with local echo, and generates escape sequences for extended keys.