←back to thread

Ubuntu on Windows

(blog.dustinkirkland.com)
2049 points bpierre | 1 comments | 30 Mar 16 16:35 UTC | HN request time: 0.206s | source
Show context
zymhan ◴[30 Mar 16 17:09 UTC] No.11390932[source]▶
"Linux geeks can think of it sort of the inverse of "wine" -- Ubuntu binaries running natively in Windows. Microsoft calls it their "Windows Subsystem for Linux"."

I find it amazing that you can have such a functional Ubuntu environment by translating system calls. Microsoft does have the advantage of Linux being open-source I suppose, while the Wine project had to reverse engineer DLLs. Or have you supply them on your own.

replies(9): >>11391001 #>>11391011 #>>11391074 #>>11391084 #>>11391105 #>>11391166 #>>11391290 #>>11391798 #>>11391866 #
dec0dedab0de ◴[30 Mar 16 17:23 UTC] No.11391074[source]▶
I would rather have the opposite. I would even pay for an official "Windows on Linux". There is a handful of games I would like to play, but other than that I have no interest in windows.
replies(4): >>11391181 #>>11391198 #>>11391351 #>>11392220 #
xienze ◴[30 Mar 16 17:32 UTC] No.11391181[source]▶
Totally doable. Use KVM to virtualize Windows and (the important part) make sure your CPU and motherboard support VT-d. Then you can pass a graphics card (separate from the one you run Linux with, naturally) to the VM and get >95% of native performance. There's lots of videos of folks doing this.
replies(4): >>11391205 #>>11391210 #>>11391473 #>>11391500 #
wernercd ◴[30 Mar 16 17:35 UTC] No.11391210[source]▶
That's still "VM" not "Native".

You aren't running them "side by side"... you are running them "One inside the other".

Not exactly an apple-to-apple comparison.

replies(3): >>11391235 #>>11391363 #>>11391437 #
1. akiselev ◴[30 Mar 16 17:48 UTC] No.11391363[source]▶
That's a distinction without a difference if you're using a modern processor with special virtualization silicon like Intel VT-i/x/d or AMD-V. With these features, IO and memory management is completely isolated between different virtual machines at the hardware level so there is almost zero overhead. With VT-d, which allows you to dedicate DMA channels to a guest VM, you can completely bypass the the host for all types of hardware including PCI/e, USB, etc.