←back to thread

Go channels are bad

(www.jtolds.com)
298 points jtolds | 2 comments | 02 Mar 16 15:40 UTC | HN request time: 0.427s | source
Show context
amelius ◴[02 Mar 16 16:33 UTC] No.11210979[source]▶
This article should have been titled: "Go channels considered harmful" :)
replies(1): >>11211038 #
kbenson ◴[02 Mar 16 16:40 UTC] No.11211038[source]▶
Thankfully it wasn't, and we were spared the ensuing discussion about how "..considered harmful" is good/bad/overused/misunderstood/causes cancer.
replies(1): >>11211106 #
1. falcolas ◴[02 Mar 16 16:49 UTC] No.11211106[source]▶
Instead we get the debate of whether "and you should feel bad" is appropriate in a title.

I don't believe it is, but ultimately click bait is click bait.

replies(1): >>11211175 #
2. kbenson ◴[02 Mar 16 17:00 UTC] No.11211175[source]▶
Eh, I don't mind click bait titles as long as the article delivers, and the title isn't too egregious in its manipulation. In this case, I think it's pretty well understood by most that the title is poking fun, since taking it truthfully is fairly ridiculous.