←back to thread

Go channels are bad

(www.jtolds.com)
298 points jtolds | 3 comments | 02 Mar 16 15:40 UTC | HN request time: 3.012s | source
Show context
woodcut ◴[02 Mar 16 16:08 UTC] No.11210785[source]▶
I find it hard to read something when the language used is so patronising.
replies(3): >>11210853 #>>11210860 #>>11210965 #
feathj ◴[02 Mar 16 16:19 UTC] No.11210860[source]▶
The language is one thing. I am so tired of trying to read articles riddled with gifs.
replies(4): >>11210937 #>>11210944 #>>11210984 #>>11211067 #
coldtea ◴[02 Mar 16 16:34 UTC] No.11210984[source]▶
I'm so tired of reading negative comments about entirely subjective (others might appreciate the gifs) and totally skippable if one doesn't like them (you can also ignore them) elements of a good post.
replies(2): >>11211103 #>>11211259 #
1. woodcut ◴[02 Mar 16 16:49 UTC] No.11211103[source]▶
Criticising how information is communicated is wholly valid.
replies(1): >>11211867 #
2. coldtea ◴[02 Mar 16 18:27 UTC] No.11211867[source]▶
Criticising how information is communicated yes.

But saying "I hate articles riddled with gifs" is far from Marshall McLuhan and Edward Tufte.

Especially since it's not some shallow Buzzfeed post, but a detailed technical explanation of a programming-related issue that the author took time and effort to write -- which makes complaining about its presentation petty.

The author obviously wanted to lighten it up and add some fun elements. And he provided his opinion and expertise for free. These kind of comments can mainly serve to discourage him from writing more, not get him to "improve" his communication.

replies(1): >>11212476 #
3. woodcut ◴[02 Mar 16 19:49 UTC] No.11212476[source]▶
alright, point taken.