←back to thread

154 points walterbell | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
INTPenis ◴[] No.10736741[source]
Since I'm completely surprised by this project and very attracted to it I thought it was best to google around for some perspective. Found this http://www.pcworld.com/article/2960524/laptop-computers/why-...

Among other things. My first question was, is the hardware open? Couldn't find an answer to that.

Edit: Apparently revision 2 of Purism will possibly have Coreboot.

replies(3): >>10736758 #>>10736798 #>>10736827 #
creshal ◴[] No.10736827[source]
The CPU uses proprietary, binary microcode blobs.

The graphics chip needs proprietary, binary firmware blobs.

The ethernet chip needs proprietary, binary firmware blobs.

The BIOS is a proprietary, binary firmware blob.

"Respects your freedom" my ass. The only difference to a whitebox laptop is marketing. Dell's or Lenovo's linux offerings are just as "free".

(And chromebooks with Coreboot are, technically, more free than both.)

replies(4): >>10736975 #>>10737206 #>>10739064 #>>10739904 #
dandelion_lover ◴[] No.10736975[source]
They are not hiding it at all. Their goal is to achieve freedom in each of those components [0].

[0] https://puri.sm/road-to-fsf-ryf-endorsement-and-beyond/

replies(1): >>10737067 #
creshal ◴[] No.10737067{3}[source]
So they're selling vague promises. Getting everyone to open source their binary blobs (and the Librem has a lot) is highly optimistic at best.
replies(2): >>10737388 #>>10737977 #
dandelion_lover ◴[] No.10737388{4}[source]
They are by far the best except for the Ministry of Freedom [0], which sell FSF-certified, but comparably slow laptops. And they admit that as I mentioned above.

Only after enough users is involved in freedom seeking, it can be possible to demand large companies to provide something we need. In my opinion, Purism do a lot in this direction.

[0] http://minifree.org/

replies(1): >>10737531 #
madez ◴[] No.10737531{5}[source]
What things did they do beside marketing? What was achieved?
replies(1): >>10740819 #
1. dandelion_lover ◴[] No.10740819{6}[source]
I am not sure whether you consider this marketing, but for me important things are (0) demonstrating the interest of customers in freedom, (1) explaining what's wrong with "ordinary" laptops to the public; increasing awareness in the media [0], and (2) working closely with QubesOS to make this system work on their laptops. Hardware switches are also very good.

And yes, it might be a scam. But might be not.

[0] (1) is being already done by FSF, but to me it looks like it's not enough.