←back to thread

154 points walterbell | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
INTPenis ◴[] No.10736741[source]
Since I'm completely surprised by this project and very attracted to it I thought it was best to google around for some perspective. Found this http://www.pcworld.com/article/2960524/laptop-computers/why-...

Among other things. My first question was, is the hardware open? Couldn't find an answer to that.

Edit: Apparently revision 2 of Purism will possibly have Coreboot.

replies(3): >>10736758 #>>10736798 #>>10736827 #
conradev ◴[] No.10736798[source]
Also worth noting is the Novena, which has similar goals: https://www.crowdsupply.com/sutajio-kosagi/novena
replies(1): >>10736813 #
satai ◴[] No.10736813[source]
Novena contains 4x Cortex A9 CPU, thet is much less power and not enough power for more serious work :(
replies(4): >>10736880 #>>10737090 #>>10737138 #>>10738414 #
david-given ◴[] No.10737090{3}[source]
I just benchmarked my shiny new Asus Chromebook Flip (4-core ARM) against my ludicrously overpowered desktop (12-core Xeon E5-1650). I ran povray --benchmark, so it was a float-heavy number-crunching exercise.

The figures were about 1500 CPU-seconds for the desktop and 3000 CPU-seconds for the Chromebook. Of course, wall-clock time was significantly less for the desktop due to having many more cores, but that's showing that per-core, the high-end Intel was only about twice as fast as the ARM.

I do development work on the Chromebook, via a Debian chroot inside Crouton. And you know what? It's fine. It's probably the fastest laptop I've ever owned. The filesystem's a little slow, but compilation speeds are perfectly adequate.

replies(4): >>10737395 #>>10737615 #>>10737658 #>>10738389 #
1. satai ◴[] No.10737615{4}[source]
The issue is Cortex A9 not ARM. Flip has Cortex A12 or Cortex A17.