←back to thread

623 points franzb | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.312s | source
Show context
po1nter ◴[] No.10563599[source]
According to iTele there are now 118 dead.

Edit: Now it's up to 140. What a sad day :(

replies(5): >>10563614 #>>10563621 #>>10563630 #>>10563643 #>>10563870 #
toyg ◴[] No.10563630[source]
Reworded to avoid offence (hopefully): deaths are not irrelevant, but their exact precise number is irrelevant. What matters is the scale of the security failure, compounded by the fact that they suffered a similar one less than a year ago and they were currently on high-alert (because they've only just started bombing Syria).

The knowledge that a network could carry out such a widespread and well-coordinated attack without being preempted, in a situation of maximum alert, will heavy on the minds of any French citizen regardless of whether victims were 118 or 119. Basically, the French security system has been revealed as completely ineffective. That is a huge problem.

replies(8): >>10563651 #>>10563652 #>>10563660 #>>10563670 #>>10563681 #>>10563716 #>>10563750 #>>10564190 #
sosborn ◴[] No.10563681[source]
> Basically, the French security system has been revealed as completely ineffective.

How can a country possibly prevent these things while still maintaining a free society?

replies(4): >>10563693 #>>10563712 #>>10563744 #>>10563756 #
dragonwriter ◴[] No.10563693[source]
> How can a country possibly prevent these things while still maintaining a free society?

You can't even prevent them when not being a free society. Its not like terrorism only occurs in free societies.

replies(1): >>10563805 #
RogtamBar[dead post] ◴[] No.10563805[source]
This is bullshit and you know this.

There is very little chance of anyone successfully getting up to terrorism if society is

a) riddled with informers b) detaining people without charges is legal c) totalitarian ideology and political supremacy makes the establishment of parallel societies impossible. Border controls make importing terrorists next to impossible.

The former eastern Bloc had no terrorist incidents. Pulling them off would be harder, the state would cover it up, etc. Just like it had practically no mob.

It did have a great many terrorists, mostly in various training camps.

clock_tower ◴[] No.10564107[source]
The Eastern Bloc had plenty of terrorism, as well as organized crime -- who do you think was supplying all those black markets?

Being a police state is one thing; being an _effective_ police state is something else, much harder (at least in the pre-computer era). In the Soviet case, it didn't help that they didn't really care much about crime...

replies(2): >>10564255 #>>10564699 #
RogtamBar ◴[] No.10564255[source]
Plenty of terrorism? USSR funded and commited plenty of terrorism, but I've yet to hear of any terrorist incidents prior to the perestroila..

Soviets did have some organized crime, but they were well, Russians.

GDR, Czechoslovakia, etc, somewhat less inept countries had very little crime and no organized crime to speak of.

replies(2): >>10564487 #>>10564657 #
1. sirrocco ◴[] No.10564487[source]
What was the cost of that "safety" ? There is no such thing as a free lunch it seems