←back to thread

Paris Shootings and Explosions Kill Over 100, Police Say

(www.nytimes.com)
623 points franzb | 3 comments | 14 Nov 15 00:25 UTC | HN request time: 0.315s | source
Show context
po1nter ◴[14 Nov 15 00:34 UTC] No.10563599[source]▶
According to iTele there are now 118 dead.

Edit: Now it's up to 140. What a sad day :(

replies(5): >>10563614 #>>10563621 #>>10563630 #>>10563643 #>>10563870 #
toyg ◴[14 Nov 15 00:42 UTC] No.10563630[source]▶
Reworded to avoid offence (hopefully): deaths are not irrelevant, but their exact precise number is irrelevant. What matters is the scale of the security failure, compounded by the fact that they suffered a similar one less than a year ago and they were currently on high-alert (because they've only just started bombing Syria).

The knowledge that a network could carry out such a widespread and well-coordinated attack without being preempted, in a situation of maximum alert, will heavy on the minds of any French citizen regardless of whether victims were 118 or 119. Basically, the French security system has been revealed as completely ineffective. That is a huge problem.

replies(8): >>10563651 #>>10563652 #>>10563660 #>>10563670 #>>10563681 #>>10563716 #>>10563750 #>>10564190 #
sosborn ◴[14 Nov 15 00:53 UTC] No.10563681[source]▶
> Basically, the French security system has been revealed as completely ineffective.

How can a country possibly prevent these things while still maintaining a free society?

replies(4): >>10563693 #>>10563712 #>>10563744 #>>10563756 #
1. Cthulhu_ ◴[14 Nov 15 01:03 UTC] No.10563744[source]▶
They can't; even the not free societies - think prisons - are not safe. People that want to do Bad Things will do them. Even if they didn't have guns or weapons, they could've - for example - get enough people into a dinner party or restaurant, have everyone grab a fork, and start stabbing people in the eye.

Terrorism doesn't need weaponry. The only deterrent would be to read people's minds, and you've probably watched Minority Report and other such dystopian scenarios. It's something that needs to be solved at the root, and TBF I don't believe it can be fixed.

replies(2): >>10564127 #>>10564797 #
2. jacquesm ◴[14 Nov 15 02:28 UTC] No.10564127[source]▶
I'm a bit more optimistic, I think it can be fixed but it will take many years (decades).
3. DrScump ◴[14 Nov 15 07:02 UTC] No.10564797[source]▶

  Terrorism doesn't need weaponry.
Indeed. Even if you deem well-coordinated attacks with just edged weapons (like the fictional ones in "The Following") unlikely, note that the Multiple-Victim public homicide with the most fatalities in US history used not a single firearm.

(and I'm not talking about 9/11, although it could count as such as well)