(www.sciencedirect.com)

136 points gwern | 2 comments | 01 Nov 15 23:33 UTC | HN request time: 0.578s | source

1. throwawayaway ◴[02 Nov 15 18:20 UTC] No.10493830[source]▶

So time for GATTACA right?

replies(1): >>10494107 #

2. hyperion2010 ◴[02 Nov 15 18:55 UTC] No.10494107[source]▶

Actually not time for GATTACA because you'd have to tweak 1000s of genes not one. Which was the finding of this paper.

Thinking positively: The genetics of high intelligence