←back to thread

136 points gwern | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.236s | source
Show context
dgrant ◴[] No.10492622[source]
Can someone explain this for someone like me with no education in biology or psychology?
replies(6): >>10492651 #>>10492754 #>>10492785 #>>10493064 #>>10493162 #>>10493879 #
kylemathews ◴[] No.10492785[source]
The researchers did a study of Swedish military conscripts (98%) of male population. They tested if high-intelligence is as inheritable as general-intelligence. They found strong evidence that it does as siblings of high-intelligent soldiers also tended to more intelligent than the norm.
replies(1): >>10493187 #
1. ambicapter ◴[] No.10493187[source]
How does that show anything. Can't you assume that siblings would be raised in similar environments?
replies(4): >>10493252 #>>10493579 #>>10493972 #>>10494273 #
2. themetrician ◴[] No.10493252[source]
Similar levels of intelligence have been seen even in switched-at-birth twin cases where one twin is raised by one family and another by another. The IQ between the twins was in every case more correlated than the IQ of each twin and their family-siblings. Look up the interview with Nancy Segal on YouTube about Twin Studies and IQ.
3. bpodgursky ◴[] No.10493579[source]
Why is the comment by themetrician dead? (sibling to comment here) I don't understand.
4. femto113 ◴[] No.10493972[source]
They controlled for environment by considering the difference between non-twin siblings (< 2 years apart in age), fraternal (two-egg) twins, and identical (single-egg) twins. The correlation in intelligence between non-twin siblings and fraternal twins was similar, and both are significantly lower than the correlation between identical twins. The most plausible explanation for this is the genes that identical twins share.
5. vox_mollis ◴[] No.10494273[source]
Nearly every twin study done in the history of twin studies has demonstrated minimal effects of shared environment on outcomes.