←back to thread

276 points chei0aiV | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.324s | source
Show context
n0us ◴[] No.10458463[source]
I really could do without "considered harmful" titles. x86 has been one of the most influential technologies of all time and a clickbait title doesn't do it justice imo.
replies(7): >>10458515 #>>10458617 #>>10458692 #>>10458787 #>>10458861 #>>10459018 #>>10459478 #
wyager ◴[] No.10458692[source]
So were PHP and goto statements.

How influential something is has nothing to do with how good it is.

replies(2): >>10458720 #>>10459089 #
jrcii ◴[] No.10459089[source]
The PHP bashing on this site is untenable. PHP has no intrinsic properties which stop a good programmer from writing elegant code for web applications. It's a tired discussion, I know, but the most you can say is that it's frequently abused. The oft cited "Spectacle of bad design" essay has been credibly rebutted point-by-point by other authors.
replies(4): >>10459463 #>>10459537 #>>10460258 #>>10461205 #
1. pizza234 ◴[] No.10459537[source]
It's hard to take seriously a statement about an article, where even the referenced title is wrong.

It's not nit picking - it shows how one didn't even took them time to read and understand the article; it's "fractal" of bad design, and it's named so for a specific reason.