←back to thread

Two HN Announcements

(blog.ycombinator.com)
698 points tilt | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.505s | source
Show context
unabst ◴[] No.10300619[source]
The biggest lost opportunity I find here on HN are not with the comments moderated poorly or that were banned, but with the comments never posted and the discussions that never happened because of harsh anonymous downvoting.

Donwvotes on HN are anonymous and silent. This equates to being slapped in the face by someone with a mask on while you're in the middle of a conversation, without knowing why, and not being able to do anything about it. In a real conversation, disagreeing with someone involves actually opening your mouth and talking to that person, and even then is not rewarded with an immediate punishment to the person you're disagreeing with. This is what leads to a discussion, or better yet, a debate. Instead, the only recourse on HN is to change how you talk or to keep quiet.

But at this point I must assume this is an intentional design decision, and I adjust my tone and substance accordingly. But I wouldn't be writing this if I weren't okay with HN's rules.

--

(edit/addendum: this isn't to say there are no discussions or debates on HN... but I hope other's agree there is something uniquely HN about most of them)

replies(5): >>10300778 #>>10300905 #>>10301270 #>>10301432 #>>10301654 #
1. qrendel ◴[] No.10301270[source]
Agreed - the only thing I dislike about HN at all is the tendency of some users to downvote anything they disagree with. It seems to have gotten worse over time (I've been lurking several years longer than my current account). Now I occasionally come by threads with a large proportion of not-terrible comments greyed out, and it does make me avoid commenting anything that might be perceived unfavorably by someone. It also seems to encourage lots of throwaway accounts for single comments of unpopular opinions. I wish something could be done about this more than anything else, but I'm not sure what that would be.
replies(1): >>10301478 #
2. ◴[] No.10301478[source]