←back to thread

Two HN Announcements

(blog.ycombinator.com)
698 points tilt | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
raldi ◴[] No.10298588[source]
> If we notice abusive vouches, we'll take away vouching rights

That might scare some people away from vouching. Could you clarify whether it'll be more like, "If you wrongly vouch for even one single thing, we'll silently and permanently remove your vouching ability forever with no possible recourse" or more like, "If you show a repeated pattern of bad vouching, we'll reach out to you and explain what you're doing wrong, and only if it continues, take away your vouching privileges as a last resort, perhaps only temporarily" (or somewhere in between those extremes)?

P.S. I couldn't be happier to hear about Dan's promotion. He has an expert touch for community management, and (I learned after an opportunity to join him for beers one night) some deep wisdom on the subject, too.

replies(3): >>10298625 #>>10298648 #>>10298968 #
dang ◴[] No.10298648[source]
Please don't worry about this. It really is just like flagging. We only take away flagging rights if someone repeatedly misuses them—never for one random thing.

I wouldn't have even included the bit about taking away vouching rights except I know that the question "What if people just vouch for all the bad comments" was going to come up otherwise.

(Also, I don't think I've been promoted? But thanks—that's particularly meaningful coming from a seasoned veteran of the early Reddit...)

replies(6): >>10298687 #>>10298761 #>>10298834 #>>10299345 #>>10300168 #>>10304498 #
larrys ◴[] No.10299345[source]
If I may ask, what is your last name, Dan?
replies(2): >>10299437 #>>10299524 #
nkurz ◴[] No.10299524[source]
This is a question better solved by Google than by asking here: http://blog.ycombinator.com/meet-the-people-taking-over-hack...

That said, Dan Gackle (pronounced Gackley, like the town in North Dakota: http://www.gacklenorthdakota.com/) should consider adding his full name to his HN profile: https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=dang

And much as I like the opacity of the Bruno Schulz quote, it probably would be a good idea for him to also mention there that he is the moderator of the site, and thus the likely recipient of those questions emailed to hn@ycombinator.com.

replies(2): >>10299714 #>>10299746 #
tptacek ◴[] No.10299714[source]
I agree. I'm a weirdo who reads all of 'dangs moderator comments and I think he should have a [mod] tag in his comment datelines, too. It seems like people pretty regularly confuse him for just another busybody user.
replies(4): >>10299869 #>>10300255 #>>10300554 #>>10300723 #
1. Cogito ◴[] No.10300723[source]
I really like the mechanism where a moderator can choose to add the [mod] tag to posts that they want to, but by default they just appear as a normal user.

For example, in the past dang has posted some really interesting content, but that should not be distinguished with a [mod] tag. Similarly interesting but non-moderator comments should not be distinguished.

replies(1): >>10300994 #
2. tedunangst ◴[] No.10300994[source]
Obvious solution: the moderator account should be called goddang.