←back to thread

Two HN Announcements

(blog.ycombinator.com)
698 points tilt | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.214s | source
Show context
p4bl0 ◴[] No.10299046[source]
Do we really need these "vouch" link? It seems like complicated for no reasons. People with showdead could just be able to upvote [dead] comments just like other comments (is it not the case already?) and a [dead] comment with enough upvote should be unkilled. And then a banned account with enough unkilled comments should be unbanned. Seems like a simple solution with no changes in the UX.
replies(2): >>10299139 #>>10299410 #
1. smtddr ◴[] No.10299410[source]
nah, I don't think of flag/vouch as the same as upvote/downvote.

Regardless of the constant arguments around it, I use upvote/downvote on opinions I agree/disagree with. I'd use flag/vouch for things that I don't/do think should be on HN at all.

e.g., on a Pokemon forum I can strongly disagree with someone who says squirtel is the better than pikachu because water-type has more advantages that electric-type. I might downvote it, maybe. But if someone posts "Pokemon are stupid, you're all wasting your lives you big losers." ...I'd flag that. Conversely, if I posted how electric-type pokemon are the best and I notice a dead-reply to me explaining very clearly a position supporting water-type pokemon as best, I'd vouch for it. While I might not agree with the argument, I can at least vouch that it shouldn't be dead.