(wiki.mozilla.org)

288 points fernandotakai | 2 comments | 11 Aug 15 03:51 UTC | HN request time: 0.438s | source

1. norea-armozel ◴[11 Aug 15 13:10 UTC] No.10040702[source]▶

Does anyone know if the maintainers of Pale Moon or Waterfox intend to keep the extension signing requirement on their builds?

replies(1): >>10040772 #

2. TheLoneWolfling ◴[11 Aug 15 13:19 UTC] No.10040772[source]▶

>>10040702 (TP) #

I very much doubt Pale Moon will, based on their reaction to previous restrictions and removals of features. I know that it would be hypocritical if they did.

Waterfox... I don't know.

↑

Firefox 42 will not allow unsigned extensions