←back to thread

288 points fernandotakai | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.21s | source
Show context
kragen ◴[] No.10039371[source]
This is deeply disappointing.

Two details: the extensions need to be signed by Mozilla, and only US English speakers will be allowed to disable this requirement.

The point of free software is that users, individually and collectively, are free to modify it as they wish, without requiring approval from third parties. (And of course to use, copy, and redistribute.) This is a sharp turn away from the free-software ethos that made Firefox possible in the first place.

I understand the issue of users being tricked into downloading and installing malicious extensions. If you let someone program, they will be able to paste malicious code. I just don’t think that taking away users’ ability to modify their own browsers is an acceptable solution to that.

If this disturbing move sticks, Mozilla will become an increasingly tempting target for whatever group wants to control what software you can install on your own computer — whether that’s Sony Pictures, the NSA, or Amazon.

The old free software movement has died. We need a new free software movement.

replies(9): >>10039538 #>>10039732 #>>10039770 #>>10040303 #>>10040371 #>>10040382 #>>10040490 #>>10041316 #>>10042478 #
dtech ◴[] No.10039538[source]
> only US English speakers will be allowed to disable this requirement

Do they assume that non-English speakers are just drooling baboons who cannot decide this for themselves unlike English speakers?...

replies(3): >>10039595 #>>10039932 #>>10039963 #
1. 0x0 ◴[] No.10039932[source]
This sounded super weird. But I guess what you are referring to is that the will only release en-US-localized builds of the "unbranded firefox" editions. That I can understand, the logistics of building and shipping all the i18n editions for an off-brand build is probably significant.