←back to thread

288 points fernandotakai | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.213s | source
Show context
scintill76 ◴[] No.10039270[source]
Ah, feels like they're following Chrome's example, which decreed that it should be exceedingly difficult for Windows Chrome users to install extensions from somewhere other than https://chrome.google.com/webstore/ . This basically killed an internal app we had at work (a fork of a "REST client", with some added request-signing features specific to our internal APIs.) There was no strong reason to keep it secret, but there had previously been no need to put it in the store either, and there was a $5 charge to publish in the Web Store, which I didn't feel like dealing with.

Anyway, they are both measures taken to stop malware, by taking an option away from the user, that most users won't even notice, but many "power users" will be inconvenienced to varying degrees. I'm guessing Firefox's won't be as bad, since the "developer version" that will let you keep doing the old way probably won't differ from the normal version as much as Chrome's does.

replies(3): >>10039511 #>>10039681 #>>10042324 #
1. _yy ◴[] No.10039681[source]
You can still install custom extensions in Chrome for Windows using - among others - group policy: https://support.google.com/chrome/a/answer/188453