←back to thread

288 points fernandotakai | 9 comments | | HN request time: 0.646s | source | bottom
1. ekianjo ◴[] No.10039351[source]
It should still possible to fork Firefox and remove this requirement, right ?
replies(5): >>10039373 #>>10039389 #>>10039684 #>>10040123 #>>10041415 #
2. kragen ◴[] No.10039373[source]
In theory, but that will be very difficult.
replies(3): >>10039382 #>>10040089 #>>10040955 #
3. ekianjo ◴[] No.10039382[source]
How about Pale Moon ?
4. a3_nm ◴[] No.10039684[source]
It's not really a full fork, but I'm fairly confident that Iceweasel, the patched and no-branding Firefox that ships with Debian, will not have this problem.

(So as I Debian user I don't really care, but it worries me slightly for the future of Mozilla.)

5. Dylan16807 ◴[] No.10040089[source]
Difficult how? Even though Mozilla is going to providing builds of just such a fork themselves? Is it particularly hard to build firefox?
6. wsha ◴[] No.10040123[source]
Mozilla has said that this requirement is set by one flag at build time, so building a version without this requirement should not be any more difficult than just compiling Firefox I have never done that, but I think it's slightly non-trivial. The hardest part though would be distributing the fork though, so a Linux distribution like Debian mentioned this change as others have mentioned would be one way to build a popular fork without this requirement.
replies(1): >>10041280 #
7. rockdoe ◴[] No.10040955[source]
It's trivial.
8. tanderson92 ◴[] No.10041280[source]
It's nontrivial, but others have worked out the details:

[1]: https://git.exherbo.org/desktop.git/tree/packages/net-www/fi...

[2]: https://git.exherbo.org/desktop.git/tree/exlibs/mozilla.exli...

9. soapdog ◴[] No.10041415[source]
you don't need to fork. There are four versions without requirement: nightly, dev edition, unbranded stable and unbranded beta. What more do you want?