AI: A Dedicated Fact-Failing Machine, Or, yet Another Reason Not to Trust It

(whatever.scalzi.com)
16 points calcifer | 6 comments | 13 Dec 25 19:49 UTC | HN request time: 1.472s | source | bottom
1. ◴[13 Dec 25 21:49 UTC] No.46258465[source]▶
2. ◴[14 Dec 25 11:47 UTC] No.46262404[source]▶
3. Kim_Bruning ◴[14 Dec 25 12:59 UTC] No.46262710[source]▶
The Authors Guild has spent years fighting to keep books out of AI training data. AI doesn't reliably know what's inside books. These facts are related.
replies(1): >>46265769 #
4. khaelenmore ◴[14 Dec 25 19:04 UTC] No.46265769[source]▶
"AI" doesn't know anything. It just generates sequences of words vaguely resembling meaningful text.
5. xg15 ◴[14 Dec 25 21:39 UTC] No.46267243[source]▶
The ChatGPT answer (that made up the dedication text) has two links as "references" for the claim. Would be interesting to know what's written on those pages.