←back to thread

You used to be able to just create a Native GUI App in 10 seconds

(twitter.com)
58 points Ezhik | 4 comments | 10 Dec 25 17:00 UTC | HN request time: 0.648s | source
Show context
amatecha ◴[10 Dec 25 18:21 UTC] No.46221343[source]▶
Can view without subjecting yourself to "X": https://xcancel.com/tsoding/status/1998403967718400376
replies(1): >>46221418 #
coldtea[dead post] ◴[10 Dec 25 18:24 UTC] No.46221418[source]▶
[flagged]
amatecha ◴[10 Dec 25 18:46 UTC] No.46221731[source]▶
Was there an actual point or are you just being contrarian for the sake of it?
replies(1): >>46221979 #
1. morshu9001 ◴[10 Dec 25 19:23 UTC] No.46222313[source]▶
I have no issue with Twitter's values or ownership. The website is just annoying and laggy, so I appreciate a readonly mirror.
2. danielbln ◴[10 Dec 25 20:30 UTC] No.46223329[source]▶
You cannot read the full thread unless you have an account and are logged in. That's reason enough to appreciate a mirror link like that.
3. amatecha ◴[10 Dec 25 21:57 UTC] No.46224446[source]▶
Did I say anything about morals or compromise or anything? Now you're just ranting to the void about a straw man, not furthering conversation in any way. I think you're the only one who needs to get over something here: the fact that people might not want to visit a certain website. The shock and horror! Take your negativity elsewhere.
replies(1): >>46225717 #
4. coldtea ◴[10 Dec 25 23:46 UTC] No.46225717[source]▶
>Did I say anything about morals or compromise or anything

So many have that it's an obvious deduction, and the bit 'subjecting yourself to "X"' alludes to the same.

Do you rather claim that X's UX is uniquely horrible than an alternative link was needed for those that can't bear it? If so, well...

Anyways, I just said we can handle the original link just fine. You asked for further clarification.