←back to thread

Google Titans architecture, helping AI have long-term memory

(research.google)
584 points Alifatisk | 5 comments | 07 Dec 25 12:23 UTC | HN request time: 0.813s | source
Show context
okdood64 ◴[07 Dec 25 14:05 UTC] No.46181759[source]▶
From the blog:

https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.00663

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.13173

Is there any other company that's openly publishing their research on AI at this level? Google should get a lot of credit for this.

replies(12): >>46181829 #>>46182057 #>>46182168 #>>46182358 #>>46182633 #>>46183087 #>>46183462 #>>46183546 #>>46183827 #>>46184875 #>>46186114 #>>46189989 #
Palmik ◴[07 Dec 25 20:33 UTC] No.46184875[source]▶
DeepSeek and other Chinese companies. Not only do they publish research, they also put their resources where their mouth (research) is. They actually use it and prove it through their open models.

Most research coming out of big US labs is counter indicative of practical performance. If it worked (too) well in practice, it wouldn't have been published.

Some examples from DeepSeek:

https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.04434

https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.11089

replies(1): >>46186643 #
abbycurtis33[dead post] ◴[07 Dec 25 23:51 UTC] No.46186643[source]▶
[flagged]
pylotlight ◴[08 Dec 25 00:44 UTC] No.46187038[source]▶
which of the 5-10~ papers DS published were stolen exactly..?
replies(1): >>46187353 #
1. FpUser ◴[08 Dec 25 01:55 UTC] No.46187440[source]▶
You were asked pretty precise question. Instead of addressing it directly your proof is that China in general does do economic espionage. So does fucking every other developed country, US including.
replies(2): >>46187974 #>>46189171 #
2. ◴[08 Dec 25 03:31 UTC] No.46187974[source]▶
3. est ◴[08 Dec 25 06:45 UTC] No.46189171[source]▶
this guy's name is literally "epsteingpt"

you are probably arguing with a bot.

replies(1): >>46189210 #
4. epsteingpt ◴[08 Dec 25 06:52 UTC] No.46189210{3}[source]▶
no. but appreciate someone with your karma jumping in.

name is just topical. although it says something about 2025 that we can't tell!

5. nl ◴[08 Dec 25 07:15 UTC] No.46189334[source]▶
Pot, Kettle, meet black.

"some elements of the indictment concern cyber-snooping in connection with trade disputes, which at least sounds a lot like the kind of cyber-snooping on firms that the United States does."

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/why-did-doj-indict-chin...

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/09/nsa-spying-bra...

https://edition.cnn.com/2015/04/30/news/airbus-germany-nsa-s...