←back to thread

224 points cspags | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
forty ◴[] No.46180249[source]
I think the kind of laptop this person wishes should simply be made illegal to make. We cannot sustain having all electric devices being thrown after a year or two, these things need to last, to be repairable and make it easy to grab pieces and materials when they die anyway
replies(9): >>46180264 #>>46180418 #>>46180657 #>>46180912 #>>46181031 #>>46181380 #>>46181801 #>>46183188 #>>46185126 #
PaulRobinson ◴[] No.46183188[source]
The half-life of Apple kit is so high, they are arguably a lot more sustainable than their repairable PC counterparts.

Apple laptops I have that boot include a 2007 iBook (my folks used it until this Summer and then bank websites would stop working with the Chrome browser they could get working on it), which I'll be putting a BSD or Linux distro on over Christmas, a 2012 Intel MBP that has Linux on it and a couple of 2015-2017 era MBPs that I inherited via one means or another.

I'm typing this on an M4 MacBook Air I picked up cheap during Black Friday sales. I fully expect it to still be functional in 10 years.

I don't think I've ever had a PC laptop last close to that.

replies(3): >>46183419 #>>46186918 #>>46198801 #
1. AuthAuth ◴[] No.46186918[source]
The half life is no different. Apple doesnt use higher quality parts. Thats just perception from their premium product marketing.

Every time I see this comparison its always "My $3000 apple laptop is still usable after 5 years while my $700 chromebook is slow after 4 years".