←back to thread

117 points LordAtlas | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.298s | source
Show context
devin ◴[] No.46183465[source]
> Every promising engineer, designer, or operator is being courted by three, five, ten different AI startups, often chasing the same vertical, whether it’s coding copilots, novel datasets, customer service, legal tech, or marketing automation.

This is flat out wrong.

replies(2): >>46183501 #>>46183542 #
throw310822 ◴[] No.46183542[source]
I still don't understand what should this "wildfire" burn. My perspective is very limited, but where are the pets.com of AI today? Where are all the small companies with improbable business cases that are getting absurd valuations/ investments because they're in AI? The space seems mostly dominated by huge players that, while burning tons of cash, are still making real progress on something that will have more economic impact than society can actually bear. Who should be wiped out by the wildfire? Anthropic?
replies(4): >>46183655 #>>46185074 #>>46185877 #>>46186107 #
philipwhiuk ◴[] No.46185877[source]
OpenAI and Anthropic.

They have no business case - they are 'burn money and hope AI allows us to build something we can monetise'. That's not a business model.

replies(1): >>46186394 #
1. throw310822 ◴[] No.46186394[source]
Don't know about OpenAI, but Claude wrote almost all of my code in the past few days, multiplying my productivity by a factor of at least two. My feeling is that for some use cases Anthropic could already charge enterprises a significant fraction of each developer's salary and it would still be a net gain for customers.