←back to thread

117 points LordAtlas | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.195s | source
Show context
ForHackernews ◴[] No.46183481[source]
> Businesses aren’t asking “do we want AI capabilities?” They’re asking “how much can we get, and how soon?”

This is only because businesses are full of folks with short-sighted FOMO desperately trying to cram AI features into any product they can. AI is the new digital clock.

replies(2): >>46183578 #>>46183692 #
AbrahamParangi ◴[] No.46183692[source]
Candidly, the accusation of short-sightedness doesn't really make sense when it comes to enthusiasm in a technology which often in practice falls short today but which in certain cases and in more cases tomorrow than today is worth tremendous business value.

If anything, you should accuse them of foolhardy recklessness. They are not the sticks in the mud.

replies(3): >>46183810 #>>46183974 #>>46184190 #
swiftcoder ◴[] No.46183810[source]
> and in more cases tomorrow than today is worth tremendous business value

That's a nice crystal ball you have there. From where I'm standing, model performance improvements have been slowing down for a while now, and without some sort of fundamental breakthrough, I don't see where the business value is going to come from

replies(1): >>46183942 #
AbrahamParangi ◴[] No.46183942[source]
The prerequisite for me to be wrong is that the technology needs to stop getting better entirely *right now* AND we need to discover ZERO new uses for what exists today.

That's a fairly tall order.

replies(2): >>46184361 #>>46185611 #
1. bigstrat2003 ◴[] No.46185611[source]
We don't even have good uses today. That doesn't mean there won't be good uses tomorrow, but neither does it inspire confidence.