←back to thread

117 points LordAtlas | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
8f2ab37a-ed6c ◴[] No.46184133[source]
With little growth and hiring happening outside of firms betting the farm on AI—and getting the funding to stay alive and play the lottery—what is a random tech employee supposed to do here?

It seems like right now the most rational move to stay in the industry is to milk the AI wave as much as possible, learn all of the tools, get a big brand name on one's resume, and then land somewhere still-alive once the AI music stops? But ultimately if nothing outside of AI is growing, it's one big game of musical chairs and even that might not save you?

replies(5): >>46184165 #>>46184443 #>>46185266 #>>46185654 #>>46185917 #
karlgkk ◴[] No.46184165[source]
That “rational move” has always been a good move, regardless of AI. This is a boom/bust industry, and the next boom will come in a few years. While we’re at it, if you’re making engineer money, you should be targeting retirement at 50. I’m not saying you have to do that, but it sure helps to have that option.
replies(2): >>46184717 #>>46184783 #
delfinom ◴[] No.46184783[source]
> if you’re making engineer money,

SV & big tech engineer money.

Majority of engineering fields do not make that kind of money to retire at 50. Comfortable compared to the rest of the country, sure.

replies(4): >>46184901 #>>46185333 #>>46185543 #>>46186178 #
onraglanroad ◴[] No.46185333{3}[source]
When you can retire depends on how little you need.

Though, of course, if you're living from investment income you should be aware you're living off the work of other people.

replies(2): >>46185439 #>>46190722 #
anonymars ◴[] No.46185439{4}[source]
Unless you're churning your own butter and manufacturing your own solar panels, isn't retirement inherently living off other people regardless of income?
replies(2): >>46185593 #>>46185637 #
1. reactordev ◴[] No.46185593{5}[source]
Isn’t social security living off the backs of other people too?
replies(2): >>46186534 #>>46193616 #
2. anonymars ◴[] No.46186534[source]
Childhood too, no? Maybe it turns out life was the original "pyramid scheme"
replies(1): >>46191071 #
3. reactordev ◴[] No.46191071[source]
Childhood was that new car smell and your parents dreaming of the kind of equity they’ll get only to get frustrated with all the maintenance.
4. onraglanroad ◴[] No.46193616[source]
Yes, they both are, it's just less obvious for investment income.