←back to thread

117 points LordAtlas | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
pizlonator ◴[] No.46183778[source]
> AI inference demand is directed at improving actual earnings. Companies are deploying intelligence to reduce customer acquisition costs, lower operational expenses, and increase worker productivity. The return is measurable and often immediate, not hypothetical.

Is the return measurable and immediate?

Is it really?

replies(2): >>46184178 #>>46184188 #
com2kid ◴[] No.46184178[source]
Yes.

Dentists offices that only need 1 receptionist instead of 2.

A dramatic reduction in front line tier 1 customer support reps.

Translation teams laid off.

Documentation teams dramatically reduced.

Data entry teams replaced by vision models.

replies(4): >>46184302 #>>46184896 #>>46185724 #>>46186356 #
pizlonator ◴[] No.46184896[source]
That's a cool dream, but my question is: is it happening?

Out of the things you listed the only ones that seem plausible are translation team and data entry team, though even there, I'd want humans to deslop the output.

replies(3): >>46184933 #>>46185353 #>>46185715 #
1. com2kid ◴[] No.46185353[source]
I'm telling you of what I've either worked on or seen myself.

Just a couple days ago a scheduled a furnace repair through an AI receptionist on the phone.

Layoffs in tech support and customer service already happened last year.

Entry level sales jobs doing cold calling have been replaced all over the place.

replies(2): >>46185704 #>>46186270 #
2. willis936 ◴[] No.46185704[source]
AI didn't replace those jobs, it was just the excuse to stop offering the service.
3. pizlonator ◴[] No.46186270[source]
Here's the thing I'm pushing back on:

> The return is measurable and often immediate, not hypothetical.

It's one thing to let go some people and replace them with AI.

It's quite another to have a measurable and often immediate, not hypothetical return on that decision.