←back to thread

117 points LordAtlas | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
devin ◴[] No.46183465[source]
> Every promising engineer, designer, or operator is being courted by three, five, ten different AI startups, often chasing the same vertical, whether it’s coding copilots, novel datasets, customer service, legal tech, or marketing automation.

This is flat out wrong.

replies(2): >>46183501 #>>46183542 #
throw310822 ◴[] No.46183542[source]
I still don't understand what should this "wildfire" burn. My perspective is very limited, but where are the pets.com of AI today? Where are all the small companies with improbable business cases that are getting absurd valuations/ investments because they're in AI? The space seems mostly dominated by huge players that, while burning tons of cash, are still making real progress on something that will have more economic impact than society can actually bear. Who should be wiped out by the wildfire? Anthropic?
replies(4): >>46183655 #>>46185074 #>>46185877 #>>46186107 #
watwut ◴[] No.46183655[source]
To be fair, if you look at language learning reddit, there are about 10 ads a day for shovelware of AI powered apps that no one ever needed. They would be those pets.com
replies(1): >>46183715 #
throw310822 ◴[] No.46183715[source]
Maybe I just didn't notice. Fair. But are these ads from companies that are collecting large capitals, or from small shops that just use the APIs provided by the few big players?
replies(2): >>46184391 #>>46184659 #
1. watwut ◴[] No.46184659[source]
I am pretty sure they use API and dont have millions on training.

I have no idea about their financials. They just annoy me, because they mask their ads as posts/comments. And use ChatGPT to generate those, they are like 2 page long drivel.