←back to thread

Principles of Slack Maximalism

(aelerinya.substack.com)
51 points surprisetalk | 3 comments | 28 Nov 25 18:36 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
throwaway150 ◴[01 Dec 25 17:35 UTC] No.46110290[source]▶
This is one of those posts where I cannot work out if this is earnest or satire. I kept waiting for a punchline but I don't know if it ever came. Makes me suspect the whole thing was the punchline.
replies(3): >>46180713 #>>46180753 #>>46180858 #
knuckleheads ◴[07 Dec 25 11:03 UTC] No.46180858[source]▶
I took it seriously and wrote up the reply that came from my gut: https://substack.com/@zackmaril/note/c-185137941

Why does one really need a slack channel to ask people if they want to go for a walk? Why not walk around and ask people if they want to take a walk?

replies(1): >>46180986 #
mirekrusin ◴[07 Dec 25 11:31 UTC] No.46180986[source]▶
Remote team?
replies(1): >>46180997 #
knuckleheads ◴[07 Dec 25 11:34 UTC] No.46180997{3}[source]▶
Do remote teams take walks together ;)
replies(2): >>46181258 #>>46182464 #
1. outofpaper ◴[07 Dec 25 12:30 UTC] No.46181258{4}[source]▶
Maybe if they are also using AR glasses and bring slack with them... They need a currently taking a walk channel.
replies(1): >>46181294 #
2. knuckleheads ◴[07 Dec 25 12:41 UTC] No.46181294[source]▶
Ah, how silly of me to overlook that option.
replies(1): >>46182509 #
3. mirekrusin ◴[07 Dec 25 15:43 UTC] No.46182509[source]▶
If you think about it "dog/whatever walking together" on a huddle could work quite well.