Most active commenters
  • alivetoad(6)

←back to thread

Touching the Elephant – TPUs

(considerthebulldog.com)
199 points giuliomagnifico | 12 comments | | HN request time: 0.899s | source | bottom
1. alivetoad ◴[] No.46179462[source]
Author here. I was expecting some negativity but for whatever reason this one bites more than I imagined. The effort here was earnest and I'm sorry it reads as slop to you. Appreciate the feedback.
replies(3): >>46180379 #>>46180383 #>>46188126 #
2. allisdust ◴[] No.46180379[source]
For every negative comment, there are 100s of positive comments that never get made.

I have spent close to 2 hours on your extremely info dense article and loved every bit of it.

Looking forward for the next one.

replies(1): >>46201536 #
3. imtringued ◴[] No.46180383[source]
For those in the know, the "MXU Cycle Timing" diagram is a thing of beauty.
replies(1): >>46201551 #
4. tomhow ◴[] No.46188126[source]
Moderator here. How much was AI used to write/edit the post?
replies(1): >>46192474 #
5. tomhow ◴[] No.46188129[source]
Please don't comment like this here. If a post seems unfit for HN, please flag it and email us at hn@ycombinator.com so we can have a look.
replies(1): >>46192363 #
6. alivetoad ◴[] No.46192363[source]
Understood
replies(1): >>46196922 #
7. alivetoad ◴[] No.46192474{3}[source]
A good bit during the editing process. Pop into Claude code to examine where the tone drifted, where the argument lost coherence, etc.
replies(1): >>46197155 #
8. daveguy ◴[] No.46196922{3}[source]
tomhow wasn't talking to you. He was talking to me. My comment was unnecessary, harsh, and unfair. It is not a bad article. I was getting a strong llm impression from the introduction and meme-image and didn't give it enough of a chance. I am genuinely sorry I overreacted and went after you like that.
9. daveguy ◴[] No.46197155{4}[source]
Hey, original a-hole here.

Just wanted to chime in (even though you probably don't want advice from me after that a-holery). I don't think LLMs are good for editing at all. They make things more wordy and obtuse. But editing is supposed to add clarity, especially in technical writing. Generally, the more you can remove while conveying the ideas the better. Honestly, I expect your original writing was better before using Claude.

Sorry again for being so harsh in the first place.

replies(1): >>46198284 #
10. alivetoad ◴[] No.46198284{5}[source]
Replying to both comments here

You're all good in my book, don't sweat it. I really do welcome the feedback. I am just some yokel from the internet, the burden is on me to write ~well enough so that reading 10k words isn't an enormous waste of time. Definitely rusty, but a little less so after wrestling with this one. I'm still ironing out my process, but writing more is the only way to get that sorted.

11. alivetoad ◴[] No.46201536{3}[source]
Appreciate it! Have a couple ideas kicking around for my next write up, but taking a beat to evaluate what went well and all that jazz
12. alivetoad ◴[] No.46201551{3}[source]
Love to hear it. I struggled feeling like they looked amateurish, but so long as the ideas are communicated clearly I can live with it