←back to thread

224 points cspags | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
1. bloppe ◴[] No.46178748[source]
I agree about some criticisms of the framework. I think they could do away with the plug modules and just go all in on usb-c. I don't mind the occasional dongle for HDMI. I also would prefer a thinner screen bezel, even if that means it's not swappable either.

But having easy access to internal hardware for upgrades is pretty huge. Rather than blowing 1-2k on a new machine every few years, it's just $200-500 for more RAM and a better CPU (assuming prices go back to normal in a reasonable amount of time)

replies(3): >>46179073 #>>46180325 #>>46185511 #
2. Octoth0rpe ◴[] No.46179073[source]
> I think they could do away with the plug modules and just go all in on usb-c. I don't mind the occasional dongle for HDMI.

Strong agree. After all, their plug modules are really just dongles that are integrated into the body, which makes them worse IMO. More expensive, model-specific, etc.

replies(1): >>46179488 #
3. synalx ◴[] No.46179488[source]
And a major consumer of space, because they have to accommodate bigger ports even if they're only doing USB-C pass-through.
4. TiredOfLife ◴[] No.46180325[source]
Frameworks (laptops) are all in on usb-c. That's the only port they come with. The modules are just type-c dongles. And they are too small - the official ethernet one hangs outside the body.
5. mft_ ◴[] No.46185511[source]
Agree; the choosing ports thing is a gimmick. These days, one video/charging-capable USB-C on each side, plus a USB-A and maybe an SD slot somewhere are enough for most use cases.