←back to thread

518 points LorenDB | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.478s | source
Show context
trollbridge ◴[] No.46173936[source]
Not to disrespect this, but it used to be entirely normal to have a GUI environment on a machine with 2MB of RAM and a 40MB disk.

Or 128K of ram and 400 kb disk for that matter.

replies(10): >>46173975 #>>46174032 #>>46174138 #>>46174272 #>>46174291 #>>46174522 #>>46174810 #>>46174831 #>>46179105 #>>46179554 #
maccard ◴[] No.46174032[source]
A single 1920x1080 framebuffer (which is a low resolution monitor in 2025 IMO) is 2MB. Add any compositing into the mix for multi window displays and it literally doesn’t fit in memory.
replies(8): >>46174159 #>>46174187 #>>46174618 #>>46174766 #>>46176381 #>>46178650 #>>46179683 #>>46182290 #
1. perching_aix ◴[] No.46178650[source]
More like 6.2+ MB, or at least I'd sure hope that a FHD resolution is paired with at least a 24 bit (8 bpc) SDR color. And then there's the triple buffered vsync at play, so it's really more like 18.6+ MB.
replies(1): >>46179560 #
2. BobbyTables2 ◴[] No.46179560[source]
My video card then didn’t have video ram for 256 color SVGA…