←back to thread

Using LLMs at Oxide

(rfd.shared.oxide.computer)
694 points steveklabnik | 3 comments | 07 Dec 25 01:17 UTC | HN request time: 0.537s | source
Show context
john01dav ◴[07 Dec 25 02:02 UTC] No.46178535[source]▶
> it is presumed that of the reader and the writer, it is the writer that has undertaken the greater intellectual exertion. (That is, it is more work to write than to read!)

This applies to natural language, but, interestingly, the opposite is true of code (in my experience and that of other people that I've discussed it with).

replies(2): >>46178563 #>>46179509 #
1. worble ◴[07 Dec 25 02:08 UTC] No.46178563[source]▶
See: Kernighan's Law

> Everyone knows that debugging is twice as hard as writing a program in the first place. So if you’re as clever as you can be when you write it, how will you ever debug it?

https://www.laws-of-software.com/laws/kernighan/

replies(2): >>46178633 #>>46179141 #
2. DrewADesign ◴[07 Dec 25 02:24 UTC] No.46178633[source]▶
I think people misunderstand this quote. Cleverness in this context is referring to complexity, and generally stems from falling in love with some complex mechanism you dream up to solve a problem rather than challenging yourself to create something simpler and easier to maintain. Bolting together bits of LLM-created code is is far more likely to be “clever” rather than good.
3. SilverSlash ◴[07 Dec 25 04:28 UTC] No.46179141[source]▶
What an amazing quote!