←back to thread

Using LLMs at Oxide

(rfd.shared.oxide.computer)
694 points steveklabnik | 1 comments | 07 Dec 25 01:17 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
monkaiju ◴[07 Dec 25 01:41 UTC] No.46178440[source]▶
Hmmm, I'm a bit confused of their conclusions (encouraging use) given some of the really damning caveats they point out. A tool they themselves determine to need such careful oversight probably just shouldn't be used near prod at all.
replies(7): >>46178488 #>>46178538 #>>46178540 #>>46178545 #>>46178605 #>>46178840 #>>46178971 #
1. devmor ◴[07 Dec 25 02:03 UTC] No.46178538[source]▶
The ultimate conclusion seems to be one that leaves it to personal responsibility - the user of the LLM is responsible for ensuring the LLM has done its job correctly. While this is the ethical conclusion to me, but the “gap” left to personal responsibility is so large that it makes me question how useful everything else in this document really is.

I don’t think it is easy to create a concise set of rules to apply in this gap for something as general as LLM use, but I do think such a ruleset is noticeably absent here.