←back to thread

Tiny Core Linux: a 23 MB Linux distro with graphical desktop

(www.tinycorelinux.net)
518 points LorenDB | 1 comments | 06 Dec 25 14:18 UTC | HN request time: 0.245s | source
Show context
trollbridge ◴[06 Dec 25 15:15 UTC] No.46173936[source]▶
Not to disrespect this, but it used to be entirely normal to have a GUI environment on a machine with 2MB of RAM and a 40MB disk.

Or 128K of ram and 400 kb disk for that matter.

replies(10): >>46173975 #>>46174032 #>>46174138 #>>46174272 #>>46174291 #>>46174522 #>>46174810 #>>46174831 #>>46179105 #>>46179554 #
maccard ◴[06 Dec 25 15:26 UTC] No.46174032[source]▶
A single 1920x1080 framebuffer (which is a low resolution monitor in 2025 IMO) is 2MB. Add any compositing into the mix for multi window displays and it literally doesn’t fit in memory.
replies(8): >>46174159 #>>46174187 #>>46174618 #>>46174766 #>>46176381 #>>46178650 #>>46179683 #>>46182290 #
beagle3 ◴[06 Dec 25 20:31 UTC] No.46176381[source]▶
The Amiga 500 had high res graphics (or high color graphics … but not on the same scanline), multitasking, 15 bit sound (with a lot of work - the hardware had 4 channels of 8 bit DACs but a 6-bit volume, so …)

In 1985, and with 512K of RAM. It was very usable for work.

replies(1): >>46176430 #
mrits ◴[06 Dec 25 20:41 UTC] No.46176430[source]▶
a 320x200 6bit color depth wasn't exactly a pleasure to use. I think the games could double the res in certain mode (was it called 13h?)
replies(2): >>46176576 #>>46177038 #
teamonkey ◴[06 Dec 25 22:14 UTC] No.46177038[source]▶
You might be thinking of DOS mode 13h, which was VGA 320x200, 8 bits per pixel.
replies(3): >>46177480 #>>46177603 #>>46178666 #
1. globalnode ◴[06 Dec 25 23:31 UTC] No.46177603[source]▶
i remember playing with mode 13h, writing little graphics programs with my turboc compiler. computers were so magical back then.