←back to thread

548 points CharlesW | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
notatoad ◴[] No.46156393[source]
I understand that sometimes the HN titles get edited to be less descriptive and more generic in order to match the actual article title.

What’s the logic with changing the title here from the actual article title it was originally submitted with “AV1 — Now Powering 30% of Netflix Streaming” to the generic and not at all representative title it currently has “AV1: a modern open codec”? That is neither the article title nor representative of the article content.

replies(6): >>46156429 #>>46156523 #>>46156635 #>>46156950 #>>46157204 #>>46157483 #
pants2 ◴[] No.46156635[source]
Though in the original title AV1 could be anything if you don't know it's a codec. How about:

"AV1 open video codec now powers 30% of Netflix viewing, adds HDR10+ and film grain synthesis"

replies(4): >>46156712 #>>46156792 #>>46157019 #>>46157309 #
nerdsniper ◴[] No.46156792[source]
AV1 is fine as-is. Plenty of technical titles on HN would need to be googled if you didn't know it. Even in yours, HDR10+ "could be anything if you don't know it". Play this game if you want, but it's unwindable. The only people who care about AV1 already know what it is.
replies(1): >>46156922 #
pants2 ◴[] No.46156922[source]
Well, I'm interested in AV1 as a videographer but hadn't heard of it before. Without 'codec' in the title I would have thought it was networking related.

Re: HDR - not the same thing. HDR has been around for decades and every TV in every electronics store blasts you with HDR10 demos. It's well known. AV1 is extremely niche and deserves 2 words to describe it.

replies(3): >>46157007 #>>46157160 #>>46167687 #
1. edoceo ◴[] No.46157160[source]
I'm old (50) and have heard AV1 before. My modern TV didn't say HDR or HDR10 (it did say 4k). Agree that AV1 should include "codec".

One word, or acronym, just isn't enough to describe anything on this modern world.