←back to thread

548 points CharlesW | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ls612 ◴[] No.46155673[source]
On a related note, why are release groups not putting out AV1 WEB-DLs? Most 4K stuff is h265 now but if AV1 is supplied without re-encoding surely that would be better?
replies(8): >>46155781 #>>46155793 #>>46155904 #>>46156363 #>>46156446 #>>46157146 #>>46157543 #>>46158925 #
Dwedit ◴[] No.46155781[source]
Because pirates are unaffected by the patent situation with H.265.
replies(2): >>46155800 #>>46157423 #
ls612 ◴[] No.46155800[source]
But isn’t AV1 just better than h.265 now regardless of the patents? The only downside is limited compatibility.
replies(3): >>46155968 #>>46156157 #>>46156589 #
1. bubblethink ◴[] No.46156589{3}[source]
HW support for av1 is still behind h265. There's a lot of 5-10 year old hw that can play h265 but not av1. Second, there is also a split bw Dovi and HDR(+). Is av1 + Dovi a thing? Blu rays are obviously h265. Overall, h265 is the common denominator for all UHD content.
replies(1): >>46157823 #
2. HelloUsername ◴[] No.46157823[source]
> Blu rays are obviously h265

Most new UHD, yes, but otherwise BRD primarily use h264/avc