←back to thread

548 points CharlesW | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ls612 ◴[] No.46155673[source]
On a related note, why are release groups not putting out AV1 WEB-DLs? Most 4K stuff is h265 now but if AV1 is supplied without re-encoding surely that would be better?
replies(8): >>46155781 #>>46155793 #>>46155904 #>>46156363 #>>46156446 #>>46157146 #>>46157543 #>>46158925 #
Dwedit ◴[] No.46155781[source]
Because pirates are unaffected by the patent situation with H.265.
replies(2): >>46155800 #>>46157423 #
ls612 ◴[] No.46155800[source]
But isn’t AV1 just better than h.265 now regardless of the patents? The only downside is limited compatibility.
replies(3): >>46155968 #>>46156157 #>>46156589 #
1. BlaDeKke ◴[] No.46155968{3}[source]
Encoding my 40TB library to AV1 with software encoding without losing quality would take more then a year of not multiple years, consume lots of power while doing this, to save a little bit of storage. Granted, after a year of non stop encoding I would save a few TB of space. But it think it is cheaper to buy a new 20TB hard drive than the electricity used for the encoding.