←back to thread

Steam Machine

(store.steampowered.com)
1173 points davikr | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.05s | source
Show context
thadt ◴[] No.45903896[source]
Pretty much the only reason I boot to Windows anymore is to play games with my kids and family. The direction of this thing is dangerously close to being all I'd care about from a desktop computer.

If Valve pivoted into making a well-supported laptop with good hardware that ran Linux and played games...

replies(9): >>45904148 #>>45904165 #>>45904184 #>>45904534 #>>45906072 #>>45906622 #>>45907407 #>>45907686 #>>45908144 #
quasigod ◴[] No.45904148[source]
Just wondering, what games are you playing that dont run on Linux yet? I can't think of games I'd play much with family that dont work well
replies(10): >>45904370 #>>45904676 #>>45905119 #>>45905173 #>>45905244 #>>45905363 #>>45905439 #>>45906235 #>>45906828 #>>45907505 #
neura ◴[] No.45904370[source]
I do not believe that _you_ are trolling with this question, but answering this is just asking to be trolled.

That said. Fortnite. Yes, I still play it with friends and cannot play it on Mac or Linux. :(

I'm sure others have similar examples. Also there are just simple things like playing with friends and streaming on Discord. Anybody streaming from Windows always comes across smooth and HD to the other participants while anybody on Linux seems to consistently be received (I don't know where exactly in the chain the problem exists, so just "received", as it may not be a broadcasting or encoding problem, I'm not an expert in this) with a lot of artifacts and lower framerates.

replies(2): >>45904504 #>>45905417 #
andai ◴[] No.45904504[source]
A friend of mine, a Linux user, says he installed Windows for gaming. Apparently the main issue isn't actual compatibility for games, but that a lot of games require some kind of kernel level anticheat (rootkit?).
replies(8): >>45904661 #>>45904745 #>>45904771 #>>45904830 #>>45905044 #>>45905088 #>>45905920 #>>45906079 #
mindcrash ◴[] No.45906079[source]
Some intrusive ones (EA's anti cheat for recent Battlefields, Activision's anti cheat for Call of Duty, anything from Riot to name a few) do not work.

However, EAC - who is a major player in this field producing generic solutions - does support Linux. The involved publisher, however, needs to approve this and the developer need to turn on a feature flag. That's it.

However, some publishers simply deny this for... totally mental reasons ...and this means that the game is marked as borked in protondb even though the game could as easily be played on Linux thanks to EAC's Linux support.

replies(1): >>45906507 #
belthesar ◴[] No.45906507[source]
"EAC supports Linux, but devs just won't turn it on" is the clickbait answer, but the details are more nuanced. EAC has multiple security levels that a title can set based on the threat model of the game, and most games with heavy MTX that use EAC shy away from it, largely because Fortnite doesn't do it. EAC is owned by Epic, and if Tim Sweeney says that you can't do MTX on Linux safely, then any AAA live services game with in-game MTX is going to shy away from it, regardless of how true the statement actually is.
replies(2): >>45906564 #>>45907363 #
1. duskwuff ◴[] No.45906564{3}[source]
"MTX" as in, microtransactions?

What do microtransactions have to do with anticheat?

replies(2): >>45907013 #>>45908142 #
2. sitzkrieg ◴[] No.45907013[source]
granting clientside without paying, things like that
3. tempest_ ◴[] No.45908142[source]
You don't want someone having a skin that you are charging money for among other things.